Skip to main content

Deterring Objectionable Behavior Online

Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF)

  • Photo of National Science Foundation Building

What is the Project About?

People encounter all kinds of objectionable content online -- misinformation, hate speech, conspiracies, bullying -- things they wish another person wouldn’t say or repeat.  They are thus inclined to “object.”  But what is the effective way to do so, particularly with so many others watching? What kinds of objections, or other behaviors, have the desired effect of reducing this kind of speech. Our project involves addressing this problem from multiple angles: from observation of the real world to experimental tests in a simulated social media environment, to agent-based modeling, to real-world interventions.

NSF Project Summary

Related Projects

User typing in chat room
Observing and Comparing Objections

Which kinds of objections are present online, and which are the most frequent? For example, do people tend to object by making threats, using logic, asking the person to leave the conversation? Are there differences across different kinds of objectionable speech, or across different social media platforms? Using large scale observations of objections on different platforms, we seek to typologize the diversity of objections, reveal their underlying general strategies, and then compare use and effectiveness across platforms.

Person ignoring comments by other people
The Impact of Objections

Do people respond differently to different kinds of objections? What kinds of emotions do they trigger? What kinds of behaviors do they prompt? This team explores the way that objections impact audiences through experiments run on the Truman architecture.

Image of people thinking
Time to Politicization

Some conversations are overtly political, but many that are ostensibly about other topics have politics lurking beneath the surface, often leading to unexpected conflict. In this project we ask when and how politics are overtly injected into conversations, and how this relates to escalation, or possibly, reconciliation, of disagreements.

Principal Investigators

  • Drew Margolin

    Associate Professor

    Department of Communication

    Drew.png
  • Natalie Bazarova

    Associate Professor

    Department of Communication

    Natalie.png
  • Vanessa Bohns

    Associate Professor

    Department of Organizational Behavior & Psychology

    Vanessa.png
  • Dominic DiFranzo

    Post-Doctoral Associate

    Department of Communication

    Dominic.png
  • Rene Kizilcec

    Assistant Professor

    Department of Information Science

    Rene.png

Team Members

  • Sangah Bae

    P.h.D Student

    Department of Organizational Behavior

    Sangah.png
  • Breanna Green

    P.h.D Student

    Department Information Science

    Breanna
  • Winice Hui

    Applications Programmer

    Department of Communication

    Winice
  • Aspen Russell

    P.h.D Student

    Department of Information Science

    Aspen
  • Ashley Shea

    P.h.D Student

    Department of Communication

    Ashley Shea Headshot
  • Chau Tong

    Post-Doctoral Associate

    Department Communication

    Chau
  • Chao Yu

    Visiting Lecturer

    Department of Communication

    Chao
  • Pengfei Zhao

    P.h.D Student

    Department of Communication

    Pengfei
  • We'd love to hear your ideas, suggestions, or questions!

    Are you
    Would you like to be contacted for further assistance?